Messages

I find flaws on both "sides" FWIW.

I do think Martin makes some interesting points that bring pause for reflection. I would encourage anyone who is interested in this topic to assess the full breadth of information currently available and form their own opinion based on where things are currently at. I believe there is still much to be revealed and do not believe the Usona report to be final word by any means.
I also remain skeptical as to the interest of Usona and Promega who are both for profit companies with interests in novel tryptamines.


One question that was raised in the podcast that I find to be particularly interesting is
Why is it that no one has attempted to work collaboratively with the Church in regards to research or study?

Speaking of Martin Ball!
Here is a new podcast in which he responds to various aspects of the Usona study, among other things.


https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/entheogenic/episodes/2023-04-24T10_00_00-07_00

Wouldn't a reference sample of psilomethoxin be needed to verify or refute presence the same way that reference samples for psilocybin, psilocin, baeocystin, etc. were used?

Am eager to see analytical results as well.
Interesting that Martin Ball appears to be completely sold on it...

Definitely interested to see results from GCMS as well.
Lots of good anecdotal reports especially at the microdose level

Your written experience really resonates with me and shares many similarities to my own.

All one 

Super excited to be here and be a part of this community.
Looking to share insights and gain knowledge from all.


Much love and many blessings.